RedHat have reannounced the dropping support for some old versions (ands April 2004, still lots of warning). I say reannounced due to the fact they originally announced this December 2002. And have had it on their website ever since (very clearly). If you want a supported RedHat distro now (by supported I mean the fixing of security and functional bugs) you either neeed to pay for and use one of the RedHat Enterprise Linuxes, or use the Fedora Project distro. The RHEL versions are released every 18 months and supported for 5 years. Fedora looks to be an ongoing thing, but community supported. Lots of freeloaders are moaning and complaining. They don’t seem to understand that if you don’t have the skills to pay the bills (and patch, fix and recompile software yourself) you pay somebody else to do it for you. This support system is how people are expected to make money from GPL/open source software (and yes, people ARE allowed to make money). It sounds like it’s mostly coming from morons who list “cost” as the main benefit of using GNU/Linux as a server operating system. Get a clue.
-
RedHat
November 11th, 2003Tags: fedora, linux, redhat -
Subversion
November 9th, 2003Tags: coding, cvs, subversionI’ve upgraded to subversion for version tracking of source code instead of moudly old cvs. I had a little trouble keeping my old modification history but don’t really care. The only feature I’m missing is the Log keyword that I used to add to the bottom of my html pages as a comment. Otherwise I’ve been very impressed. I’m working on getting a viewcvs interface up for a remote copy of my repository soon.
John Leach is a human being living in Leeds, UK.